2012 Mercedes-Benz ML 63 AMG
The Good: – Fastest 4×4 ever tested – Cabin space and features – Fairly comfortable ride |
The Bad: – Not so fast off-road – Tubby styling – Pricey with options |
The Good: – Fastest 4×4 ever tested – Cabin space and features – Fairly comfortable ride |
The Bad: – Not so fast off-road – Tubby styling – Pricey with options |
The Good: – Massive presence – Cabin space and features – Fairly comfortable ride |
The Bad: – Massive size – Fuel economy as expected – High step-on height |
The Good: – Classic good looks – Decent engine – Unbreakable offroad |
The Bad: – Maybe too classic – Unrefined onroad drive – Hard cabin plastics |
The Good: – Premium interior feel – Good ride and handling – Excellent rear legroom |
The Bad: – Pricey with options – No low-range gearing – Average boot space |
The Good: – Pretty damn quick – Cabin space and features – Sharp handling |
The Bad: – Very expensive – Conservative styling – Not much of an offroader |
The Good: – As cheap as a small dog – Decent cabin space – Fairly comfortable ride |
The Bad: – Cheapness obvious in base trim – Hard cabin plastics – Gets noisy at highway speeds |
The Good: – Excellent offroader – Cabin space and practicality – Powerful engine |
The Bad: – Hard-plastic cabin – Engine noise, all the time – Unimpressive fuel economy |
The Good: – Great fuel economy – Cabin space and practicality – Decent handling |
The Bad: – Basic gearbox & no low-range – Noticeable road noise – Hard cabin plastics |
The Good: – Rather good engine – Cabin space and features – Very comfortable ride |
The Bad: – Largely conservative styling – Handling errs on side of caution – Limited feedback from controls |
The Good: – Fun handling – Fun engine – Fun gadgetry |
The Bad: – Price not fun – Practicality not fun – Firm ride not fun |